Ruby/rack/1.6.0.beta2
Rack provides a minimal, modular and adaptable interface for developing web applications in Ruby. By wrapping HTTP requests and responses in the simplest way possible, it unifies and distills the API for web servers, web frameworks, and software in between (the so-called middleware) into a single method call.
https://rubygems.org/gems/rack
MIT
46 Security Vulnerabilities
Rack vulnerable to ReDoS in content type parsing (2nd degree polynomial)
- https://github.com/rack/rack/security/advisories/GHSA-22f2-v57c-j9cx
- https://github.com/rack/rack/commit/6efb2ceea003c4b195815a614e00438cbd543462
- https://github.com/rack/rack/commit/d9c163a443b8cadf4711d84bd2c58cb9ef89cf49
- https://discuss.rubyonrails.org/t/denial-of-service-vulnerability-in-rack-content-type-parsing/84941
- https://github.com/rubysec/ruby-advisory-db/blob/master/gems/rack/CVE-2024-25126.yml
- https://github.com/advisories/GHSA-22f2-v57c-j9cx
- https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-25126
- https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2024/04/msg00022.html
- https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20240510-0005
Summary
module Rack
class MediaType
SPLIT_PATTERN = %r{\s*[;,]\s*}
The above regexp is subject to ReDos. 50K blank characters as a prefix to the header will take over 10s to split.
PoC
A simple HTTP request with lots of blank characters in the content-type header:
request["Content-Type"] = (" " * 50_000) + "a,"
Impact
It's a very easy to craft ReDoS. Like all ReDoS the impact is debatable.
Rack has possible DoS Vulnerability in Multipart MIME parsing
- https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2023-27530
- https://discuss.rubyonrails.org/t/cve-2023-27530-possible-dos-vulnerability-in-multipart-mime-parsing/82388
- https://github.com/rubysec/ruby-advisory-db/blob/master/gems/rack/CVE-2023-27530.yml
- https://github.com/advisories/GHSA-3h57-hmj3-gj3p
- https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2023/04/msg00017.html
- https://www.debian.org/security/2023/dsa-5530
- https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20231208-0015/
- https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20231208-0015
There is a possible DoS vulnerability in the Multipart MIME parsing code in Rack. This vulnerability has been assigned the CVE identifier CVE-2023-27530.
Versions Affected: All. Not affected: None Fixed Versions: 3.0.4.2, 2.2.6.3, 2.1.4.3, 2.0.9.3
Impact
The Multipart MIME parsing code in Rack limits the number of file parts, but does not limit the total number of parts that can be uploaded. Carefully crafted requests can abuse this and cause multipart parsing to take longer than expected.
All users running an affected release should either upgrade or use one of the workarounds immediately.
Workarounds
A proxy can be configured to limit the POST body size which will mitigate this issue.
Rack Header Parsing leads to Possible Denial of Service Vulnerability
- https://github.com/rack/rack/security/advisories/GHSA-54rr-7fvw-6x8f
- https://github.com/rack/rack/commit/30b8e39a578b25d4bdcc082c1c52c6f164b59716
- https://github.com/rack/rack/commit/6c5d90bdcec0949f7ba06db62fb740dab394b582
- https://github.com/rack/rack/commit/a227cd793778c7c3a827d32808058571569cda6f
- https://github.com/rack/rack/commit/e4c117749ba24a66f8ec5a08eddf68deeb425ccd
- https://discuss.rubyonrails.org/t/possible-denial-of-service-vulnerability-in-rack-header-parsing/84942
- https://github.com/rubysec/ruby-advisory-db/blob/master/gems/rack/CVE-2024-26146.yml
- https://github.com/advisories/GHSA-54rr-7fvw-6x8f
- https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-26146
Possible Denial of Service Vulnerability in Rack Header Parsing
There is a possible denial of service vulnerability in the header parsing routines in Rack. This vulnerability has been assigned the CVE identifier CVE-2024-26146.
Versions Affected: All. Not affected: None Fixed Versions: 2.0.9.4, 2.1.4.4, 2.2.8.1, 3.0.9.1
Impact
Carefully crafted headers can cause header parsing in Rack to take longer than expected resulting in a possible denial of service issue. Accept and Forwarded headers are impacted.
Ruby 3.2 has mitigations for this problem, so Rack applications using Ruby 3.2 or newer are unaffected.
Releases
The fixed releases are available at the normal locations.
Workarounds
There are no feasible workarounds for this issue.
Patches
To aid users who aren't able to upgrade immediately we have provided patches for the two supported release series. They are in git-am format and consist of a single changeset.
- 2-0-header-redos.patch - Patch for 2.0 series
- 2-1-header-redos.patch - Patch for 2.1 series
- 2-2-header-redos.patch - Patch for 2.2 series
- 3-0-header-redos.patch - Patch for 3.0 series
Credits
Thanks to svalkanov for reporting this and providing patches!
Directory traversal in Rack::Directory app bundled with Rack
- https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2020-8161
- https://github.com/advisories/GHSA-5f9h-9pjv-v6j7
- https://github.com/rack/rack/commit/dddb7ad18ed79ca6ab06ccc417a169fde451246e
- https://github.com/rubysec/ruby-advisory-db/blob/master/gems/rack/CVE-2020-8161.yml
- https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/ruby-security-ann/T4ZIsfRf2eA
- https://groups.google.com/g/rubyonrails-security/c/IOO1vNZTzPA
- https://hackerone.com/reports/434404
- https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2020/07/msg00006.html
- https://usn.ubuntu.com/4561-1/
- https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2023/01/msg00038.html
A directory traversal vulnerability exists in rack < 2.2.0 that allows an attacker perform directory traversal vulnerability in the Rack::Directory app that is bundled with Rack which could result in information disclosure.
Rack vulnerable to Cross-site Scripting
- https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2018-16471
- https://github.com/advisories/GHSA-5r2p-j47h-mhpg
- https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/rubyonrails-security/GKsAFT924Ag
- https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2018/11/msg00022.html
- https://usn.ubuntu.com/4089-1/
- http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2019-06/msg00032.html
- http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2020-02/msg00016.html
- https://github.com/rubysec/ruby-advisory-db/blob/master/gems/rack/CVE-2018-16471.yml
- https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/ruby-security-ann/NAalCee8n6o
There is a possible XSS vulnerability in Rack before 2.0.6 and 1.6.11. Carefully crafted requests can impact the data returned by the scheme method on Rack::Request. Applications that expect the scheme to be limited to 'http' or 'https' and do not escape the return value could be vulnerable to an XSS attack. Note that applications using the normal escaping mechanisms provided by Rails may not impacted, but applications that bypass the escaping mechanisms, or do not use them may be vulnerable.
Rack has an unsafe default in Rack::QueryParser allows params_limit bypass via semicolon-separated parameters
Summary
Rack::QueryParser in version < 2.2.18 enforces its params_limit only for parameters separated by &, while still splitting on both & and ;. As a result, attackers could use ; separators to bypass the parameter count limit and submit more parameters than intended.
Details
The issue arises because Rack::QueryParser#check_query_string counts only & characters when determining the number of parameters, but the default separator regex DEFAULT_SEP = /[&;] */n splits on both & and ;. This mismatch means that queries using ; separators were not included in the parameter count, allowing params_limit to be bypassed.
Other safeguards (bytesize_limit and key_space_limit) still applied, but did not prevent this particular bypass.
Impact
Applications or middleware that directly invoke Rack::QueryParser with its default configuration (no explicit delimiter) could be exposed to increased CPU and memory consumption. This can be abused as a limited denial-of-service vector.
Rack::Request, the primary entry point for typical Rack applications, uses QueryParser in a safe way and does not appear vulnerable by default. As such, the severity is considered low, with the impact limited to edge cases where QueryParser is used directly.
Mitigation
- Upgrade to a patched version of Rack where both
∧are counted consistently towardparams_limit. - If upgrading is not immediately possible, configure
QueryParserwith an explicit delimiter (e.g.,&) to avoid the mismatch. - As a general precaution, enforce query string and request size limits at the web server or proxy layer (e.g., Nginx, Apache, or a CDN) to mitigate excessive parsing overhead.
Denial of service via header parsing in Rack
- https://github.com/rack/rack/releases/tag/v3.0.4.1
- https://github.com/advisories/GHSA-65f5-mfpf-vfhj
- https://github.com/rubysec/ruby-advisory-db/blob/master/gems/rack/CVE-2022-44570.yml
- https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2022-44570
- https://discuss.rubyonrails.org/t/cve-2022-44570-possible-denial-of-service-vulnerability-in-racks-range-header-parsing/82125
- https://www.debian.org/security/2023/dsa-5530
- https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20231208-0010/
- https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20231208-0010
There is a possible denial of service vulnerability in the Range header parsing component of Rack. This vulnerability has been assigned the CVE identifier CVE-2022-44570.
Versions Affected: >= 1.5.0 Not affected: None. Fixed Versions: 2.0.9.2, 2.1.4.2, 2.2.6.2, 3.0.0.1 Impact
Carefully crafted input can cause the Range header parsing component in Rack to take an unexpected amount of time, possibly resulting in a denial of service attack vector. Any applications that deal with Range requests (such as streaming applications, or applications that serve files) may be impacted. Releases
The fixed releases are available at the normal locations. Workarounds
There are no feasible workarounds for this issue. Patches
To aid users who aren’t able to upgrade immediately we have provided patches for the two supported release series. They are in git-am format and consist of a single changeset.
2-0-Fix-ReDoS-in-Rack-Utils.get_byte_ranges.patch - Patch for 2.0 series
2-1-Fix-ReDoS-in-Rack-Utils.get_byte_ranges.patch - Patch for 2.1 series
2-2-Fix-ReDoS-in-Rack-Utils.get_byte_ranges.patch - Patch for 2.2 series
3-0-Fix-ReDoS-in-Rack-Utils.get_byte_ranges.patch - Patch for 3.0 series
Rack is vulnerable to a memory-exhaustion DoS through unbounded URL-encoded body parsing
- https://github.com/rack/rack/security/advisories/GHSA-6xw4-3v39-52mm
- https://github.com/rack/rack/commit/4e2c903991a790ee211a3021808ff4fd6fe82881
- https://github.com/rack/rack/commit/cbd541e8a3d0c5830a3c9a30d3718ce2e124f9db
- https://github.com/rack/rack/commit/e179614c4a653283286f5f046428cbb85f21146f
- https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-61919
- https://github.com/rubysec/ruby-advisory-db/blob/master/gems/rack/CVE-2025-61919.yml
- https://github.com/advisories/GHSA-6xw4-3v39-52mm
Summary
Rack::Request#POST reads the entire request body into memory for Content-Type: application/x-www-form-urlencoded, calling rack.input.read(nil) without enforcing a length or cap. Large request bodies can therefore be buffered completely into process memory before parsing, leading to denial of service (DoS) through memory exhaustion.
Details
When handling non-multipart form submissions, Rack’s request parser performs:
form_vars = get_header(RACK_INPUT).read
Since read is called with no argument, the entire request body is loaded into a Ruby String. This occurs before query parameter parsing or enforcement of any params_limit. As a result, Rack applications without an upstream body-size limit can experience unbounded memory allocation proportional to request size.
Impact
Attackers can send large application/x-www-form-urlencoded bodies to consume process memory, causing slowdowns or termination by the operating system (OOM). The effect scales linearly with request size and concurrency. Even with parsing limits configured, the issue occurs before those limits are enforced.
Mitigation
- Update to a patched version of Rack that enforces form parameter limits using
query_parser.bytesize_limit, preventing unbounded reads ofapplication/x-www-form-urlencodedbodies. - Enforce strict maximum body size at the proxy or web server layer (e.g., Nginx
client_max_body_size, ApacheLimitRequestBody).
Possible Log Injection in Rack::CommonLogger
- https://github.com/rack/rack/security/advisories/GHSA-7g2v-jj9q-g3rg
- https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-25184
- https://github.com/rack/rack/commit/074ae244430cda05c27ca91cda699709cfb3ad8e
- https://github.com/rubysec/ruby-advisory-db/blob/master/gems/rack/CVE-2025-25184.yml
- https://github.com/advisories/GHSA-7g2v-jj9q-g3rg
- https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2025/03/msg00016.html
Summary
Rack::CommonLogger can be exploited by crafting input that includes newline characters to manipulate log entries. The supplied proof-of-concept demonstrates injecting malicious content into logs.
Details
When a user provides the authorization credentials via Rack::Auth::Basic, if success, the username will be put in env['REMOTE_USER'] and later be used by Rack::CommonLogger for logging purposes.
The issue occurs when a server intentionally or unintentionally allows a user creation with the username contain CRLF and white space characters, or the server just want to log every login attempts. If an attacker enters a username with CRLF character, the logger will log the malicious username with CRLF characters into the logfile.
Impact
Attackers can break log formats or insert fraudulent entries, potentially obscuring real activity or injecting malicious data into log files.
Mitigation
- Update to the latest version of Rack.
Local File Inclusion in Rack::Static
- https://github.com/rack/rack/security/advisories/GHSA-7wqh-767x-r66v
- https://github.com/rack/rack/commit/50caab74fa01ee8f5dbdee7bb2782126d20c6583
- https://github.com/advisories/GHSA-7wqh-767x-r66v
- https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-27610
- https://github.com/rubysec/ruby-advisory-db/blob/master/gems/rack/CVE-2025-27610.yml
- https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2025/03/msg00016.html
Summary
Rack::Static can serve files under the specified root: even if urls: are provided, which may expose other files under the specified root: unexpectedly.
Details
The vulnerability occurs because Rack::Static does not properly sanitize user-supplied paths before serving files. Specifically, encoded path traversal sequences are not correctly validated, allowing attackers to access files outside the designated static file directory.
Impact
By exploiting this vulnerability, an attacker can gain access to all files under the specified root: directory, provided they are able to determine then path of the file.
Mitigation
- Update to the latest version of Rack, or
- Remove usage of
Rack::Static, or - Ensure that
root:points at a directory path which only contains files which should be accessed publicly.
It is likely that a CDN or similar static file server would also mitigate the issue.
Escape Sequence Injection vulnerability in Rack lead to Possible Log Injection
- https://github.com/rack/rack/security/advisories/GHSA-8cgq-6mh2-7j6v
- https://github.com/rack/rack/commit/803aa221e8302719715e224f4476e438f2531a53
- https://github.com/rack/rack/commit/aeac570bb8080ca7b53b7f2e2f67498be7ebd30b
- https://github.com/rack/rack/commit/b13bc6bfc7506aca3478dc5ac1c2ec6fc53f82a3
- https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-27111
- https://github.com/advisories/GHSA-8cgq-6mh2-7j6v
- https://github.com/rubysec/ruby-advisory-db/blob/master/gems/rack/CVE-2025-27111.yml
- https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2025/03/msg00016.html
Summary
Rack::Sendfile can be exploited by crafting input that includes newline characters to manipulate log entries.
Details
The Rack::Sendfile middleware logs unsanitized header values from the X-Sendfile-Type header. An attacker can exploit this by injecting escape sequences (such as newline characters) into the header, resulting in log injection.
Impact
This vulnerability can distort log files, obscure attack traces, and complicate security auditing.
Mitigation
- Update to the latest version of Rack, or
- Remove usage of
Rack::Sendfile.
Rack has an Unbounded-Parameter DoS in Rack::QueryParser
- https://github.com/rack/rack/security/advisories/GHSA-gjh7-p2fx-99vx
- https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-46727
- https://github.com/rack/rack/commit/2bb5263b464b65ba4b648996a579dbd180d2b712
- https://github.com/rack/rack/commit/3f5a4249118d09d199fe480466c8c6717e43b6e3
- https://github.com/rack/rack/commit/cd6b70a1f2a1016b73dc906f924869f4902c2d74
- https://github.com/advisories/GHSA-gjh7-p2fx-99vx
- https://github.com/rubysec/ruby-advisory-db/blob/master/gems/rack/CVE-2025-46727.yml
Summary
Rack::QueryParser parses query strings and application/x-www-form-urlencoded bodies into Ruby data structures without imposing any limit on the number of parameters, allowing attackers to send requests with extremely large numbers of parameters.
Details
The vulnerability arises because Rack::QueryParser iterates over each &-separated key-value pair and adds it to a Hash without enforcing an upper bound on the total number of parameters. This allows an attacker to send a single request containing hundreds of thousands (or more) of parameters, which consumes excessive memory and CPU during parsing.
Impact
An attacker can trigger denial of service by sending specifically crafted HTTP requests, which can cause memory exhaustion or pin CPU resources, stalling or crashing the Rack server. This results in full service disruption until the affected worker is restarted.
Mitigation
- Update to a version of Rack that limits the number of parameters parsed, or
- Use middleware to enforce a maximum query string size or parameter count, or
- Employ a reverse proxy (such as Nginx) to limit request sizes and reject oversized query strings or bodies.
Limiting request body sizes and query string lengths at the web server or CDN level is an effective mitigation.
Possible Information Leak / Session Hijack Vulnerability in Rack
- https://github.com/rack/rack/security/advisories/GHSA-hrqr-hxpp-chr3
- https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2019-16782
- https://github.com/advisories/GHSA-hrqr-hxpp-chr3
- https://github.com/rack/rack/commit/7fecaee81f59926b6e1913511c90650e76673b38
- http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2019/12/18/2
- http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2019/12/18/3
- http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2019/12/19/3
- https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/HZXMWILCICQLA2BYSP6I2CRMUG53YBLX/
- http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2020-02/msg00016.html
- http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2020/04/08/1
- http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2020/04/09/2
- https://github.com/rubysec/ruby-advisory-db/blob/master/gems/rack/CVE-2019-16782.yml
- https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce%40lists.fedoraproject.org/message/HZXMWILCICQLA2BYSP6I2CRMUG53YBLX
- https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/HZXMWILCICQLA2BYSP6I2CRMUG53YBLX
There's a possible information leak / session hijack vulnerability in Rack. Attackers may be able to find and hijack sessions by using timing attacks targeting the session id. Session ids are usually stored and indexed in a database that uses some kind of scheme for speeding up lookups of that session id. By carefully measuring the amount of time it takes to look up a session, an attacker may be able to find a valid session id and hijack the session.
The session id itself may be generated randomly, but the way the session is indexed by the backing store does not use a secure comparison.
Impact
The session id stored in a cookie is the same id that is used when querying the backing session storage engine. Most storage mechanisms (for example a database) use some sort of indexing in order to speed up the lookup of that id. By carefully timing requests and session lookup failures, an attacker may be able to perform a timing attack to determine an existing session id and hijack that session.
Releases
The 1.6.12 and 2.0.8 releases are available at the normal locations.
Workarounds
There are no known workarounds.
Patches
To aid users who aren't able to upgrade immediately we have provided patches for the two supported release series. They are in git-am format and consist of a single changeset.
- 1-6-session-timing-attack.patch - Patch for 1.6 series
- 2-0-session-timing-attack.patch - Patch for 2.6 series
Credits
Thanks Will Leinweber for reporting this!
Denial of Service Vulnerability in Rack Multipart Parsing
- https://github.com/rubysec/ruby-advisory-db/blob/master/gems/rack/CVE-2022-30122.yml
- https://groups.google.com/g/ruby-security-ann/c/L2Axto442qk
- https://github.com/advisories/GHSA-hxqx-xwvh-44m2
- https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2022-30122
- https://discuss.rubyonrails.org/t/cve-2022-30122-denial-of-service-vulnerability-in-rack-multipart-parsing/80729
- https://www.debian.org/security/2023/dsa-5530
- https://security.gentoo.org/glsa/202310-18
- https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20231208-0012/
There is a possible denial of service vulnerability in the multipart parsing component of Rack. This vulnerability has been assigned the CVE identifier CVE-2022-30122.
Versions Affected: >= 1.2 Not affected: < 1.2 Fixed Versions: 2.0.9.1, 2.1.4.1, 2.2.3.1
Impact
Carefully crafted multipart POST requests can cause Rack's multipart parser to take much longer than expected, leading to a possible denial of service vulnerability.
Impacted code will use Rack's multipart parser to parse multipart posts. This includes directly using the multipart parser like this:
params = Rack::Multipart.parse_multipart(env)
But it also includes reading POST data from a Rack request object like this:
p request.POST # read POST data
p request.params # reads both query params and POST data
All users running an affected release should either upgrade or use one of the workarounds immediately.
Workarounds
There are no feasible workarounds for this issue.
Rack allows Percent-encoded cookies to overwrite existing prefixed cookie names
- https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2020-8184
- https://github.com/advisories/GHSA-j6w9-fv6q-3q52
- https://github.com/rack/rack/commit/1f5763de6a9fe515ff84992b343d63c88104654c
- https://hackerone.com/reports/895727
- https://github.com/rubysec/ruby-advisory-db/blob/master/gems/rack/CVE-2020-8184.yml
- https://groups.google.com/g/rubyonrails-security/c/OWtmozPH9Ak
- https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2020/07/msg00006.html
- https://usn.ubuntu.com/4561-1/
- https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2023/01/msg00038.html
A reliance on cookies without validation/integrity check security vulnerability exists in rack < 2.2.3, rack < 2.1.4 that makes it possible for an attacker to forge a secure or host-only cookie prefix.
Rack's unbounded multipart preamble buffering enables DoS (memory exhaustion)
- https://github.com/rack/rack/security/advisories/GHSA-p543-xpfm-54cp
- https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-61770
- https://github.com/rack/rack/commit/589127f4ac8b5cf11cf88fb0cd116ffed4d2181e
- https://github.com/rack/rack/commit/d869fed663b113b95a74ad53e1b5cae6ab31f29e
- https://github.com/rack/rack/commit/e08f78c656c9394d6737c022bde087e0f33336fd
- https://github.com/rubysec/ruby-advisory-db/blob/master/gems/rack/CVE-2025-61770.yml
- https://github.com/advisories/GHSA-p543-xpfm-54cp
Summary
Rack::Multipart::Parser buffers the entire multipart preamble (bytes before the first boundary) in memory without any size limit. A client can send a large preamble followed by a valid boundary, causing significant memory use and potential process termination due to out-of-memory (OOM) conditions.
Details
While searching for the first boundary, the parser appends incoming data into a shared buffer (@sbuf.concat(content)) and scans for the boundary pattern:
@sbuf.scan_until(@body_regex)
If the boundary is not yet found, the parser continues buffering data indefinitely. There is no trimming or size cap on the preamble, allowing attackers to send arbitrary amounts of data before the first boundary.
Impact
Remote attackers can trigger large transient memory spikes by including a long preamble in multipart/form-data requests. The impact scales with allowed request sizes and concurrency, potentially causing worker crashes or severe slowdown due to garbage collection.
Mitigation
- Upgrade: Use a patched version of Rack that enforces a preamble size limit (e.g., 16 KiB) or discards preamble data entirely per RFC 2046 § 5.1.1.
- Workarounds:
- Limit total request body size at the proxy or web server level.
- Monitor memory and set per-process limits to prevent OOM conditions.
Rack has a Possible Information Disclosure Vulnerability
- https://github.com/rack/rack/security/advisories/GHSA-r657-rxjc-j557
- https://github.com/rack/rack/commit/57277b7741581fa827472c5c666f6e6a33abd784
- https://github.com/rack/rack/commit/7e69f65eefe9cd2868df9f9f3b0977b86f93523a
- https://github.com/rack/rack/commit/fba2c8bc63eb787ff4b19bc612d315fda6126d85
- https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-61780
- https://github.com/rubysec/ruby-advisory-db/blob/master/gems/rack/CVE-2025-61780.yml
- https://github.com/advisories/GHSA-r657-rxjc-j557
Summary
A possible information disclosure vulnerability existed in Rack::Sendfile when running behind a proxy that supports x-sendfile headers (such as Nginx). Specially crafted headers could cause Rack::Sendfile to miscommunicate with the proxy and trigger unintended internal requests, potentially bypassing proxy-level access restrictions.
Details
When Rack::Sendfile received untrusted x-sendfile-type or x-accel-mapping headers from a client, it would interpret them as proxy configuration directives. This could cause the middleware to send a redirect
response to the proxy, prompting it to reissue a new internal request that was not subject to the proxy's access controls.
An attacker could exploit this by: 1. Setting a crafted x-sendfile-type: x-accel-redirect header. 2. Setting a crafted x-accel-mapping header. 3. Requesting a path that qualifies for proxy-based acceleration.
Impact
Attackers could bypass proxy-enforced restrictions and access internal endpoints intended to be protected (such as administrative pages). The vulnerability did not allow arbitrary file reads but could expose sensitive application routes.
This issue only affected systems meeting all of the following conditions:
- The application used
Rack::Sendfilewith a proxy that supportsx-accel-redirect(e.g., Nginx). - The proxy did not always set or remove the
x-sendfile-typeandx-accel-mappingheaders. - The application exposed an endpoint that returned a body responding to
.to_path.
Mitigation
- Upgrade to a fixed version of Rack which requires explicit configuration to enable
x-accel-redirect:
use Rack::Sendfile, "x-accel-redirect"
- Alternatively, configure the proxy to always set or strip the headers (you should be doing this!):
proxy_set_header x-sendfile-type x-accel-redirect;
proxy_set_header x-accel-mapping /var/www/=/files/;
- Or in Rails applications, disable sendfile completely:
config.action_dispatch.x_sendfile_header = nil
Rack session gets restored after deletion
- https://github.com/rack/rack-session/security/advisories/GHSA-9j94-67jr-4cqj
- https://github.com/rack/rack/security/advisories/GHSA-vpfw-47h7-xj4g
- https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-32441
- https://github.com/rack/rack/commit/c48e52f7c57e99e1e1bf54c8760d4f082cd1c89d
- https://github.com/rack/rack/blob/v2.2.13/lib/rack/session/abstract/id.rb#L263-L270
- https://github.com/advisories/GHSA-vpfw-47h7-xj4g
- https://github.com/rubysec/ruby-advisory-db/blob/master/gems/rack/CVE-2025-32441.yml
Summary
When using the Rack::Session::Pool middleware, simultaneous rack requests can restore a deleted rack session, which allows the unauthenticated user to occupy that session.
Details
Rack session middleware prepares the session at the beginning of request, then saves is back to the store with possible changes applied by host rack application. This way the session becomes to be a subject of race conditions in general sense over concurrent rack requests.
Impact
When using the Rack::Session::Pool middleware, and provided the attacker can acquire a session cookie (already a major issue), the session may be restored if the attacker can trigger a long running request (within that same session) adjacent to the user logging out, in order to retain illicit access even after a user has attempted to logout.
Mitigation
- Update to the latest version of
rack, or - Ensure your application invalidates sessions atomically by marking them as logged out e.g., using a
logged_outflag, instead of deleting them, and check this flag on every request to prevent reuse, or - Implement a custom session store that tracks session invalidation timestamps and refuses to accept session data if the session was invalidated after the request began.
Related
As this code was moved to rack-session in Rack 3+, see https://github.com/rack/rack-session/security/advisories/GHSA-9j94-67jr-4cqj for the equivalent advisory in rack-session (affecting Rack 3+ only).
Rack: Multipart parser buffers large non‑file fields entirely in memory, enabling DoS (memory exhaustion)
- https://github.com/rack/rack/security/advisories/GHSA-w9pc-fmgc-vxvw
- https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-61771
- https://github.com/rack/rack/commit/589127f4ac8b5cf11cf88fb0cd116ffed4d2181e
- https://github.com/rack/rack/commit/d869fed663b113b95a74ad53e1b5cae6ab31f29e
- https://github.com/rack/rack/commit/e08f78c656c9394d6737c022bde087e0f33336fd
- https://github.com/rubysec/ruby-advisory-db/blob/master/gems/rack/CVE-2025-61771.yml
- https://github.com/advisories/GHSA-w9pc-fmgc-vxvw
Summary
Rack::Multipart::Parser stores non-file form fields (parts without a filename) entirely in memory as Ruby String objects. A single large text field in a multipart/form-data request (hundreds of megabytes or more) can consume equivalent process memory, potentially leading to out-of-memory (OOM) conditions and denial of service (DoS).
Details
During multipart parsing, file parts are streamed to temporary files, but non-file parts are buffered into memory:
body = String.new # non-file → in-RAM buffer
@mime_parts[mime_index].body << content
There is no size limit on these in-memory buffers. As a result, any large text field—while technically valid—will be loaded fully into process memory before being added to params.
Impact
Attackers can send large non-file fields to trigger excessive memory usage. Impact scales with request size and concurrency, potentially leading to worker crashes or severe garbage-collection overhead. All Rack applications processing multipart form submissions are affected.
Mitigation
- Upgrade: Use a patched version of Rack that enforces a reasonable size cap for non-file fields (e.g., 2 MiB).
- Workarounds:
- Restrict maximum request body size at the web-server or proxy layer (e.g., Nginx
client_max_body_size). - Validate and reject unusually large form fields at the application level.
- Restrict maximum request body size at the web-server or proxy layer (e.g., Nginx
Rack's multipart parser buffers unbounded per-part headers, enabling DoS (memory exhaustion)
- https://github.com/rack/rack/security/advisories/GHSA-wpv5-97wm-hp9c
- https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-61772
- https://github.com/rack/rack/commit/589127f4ac8b5cf11cf88fb0cd116ffed4d2181e
- https://github.com/rack/rack/commit/d869fed663b113b95a74ad53e1b5cae6ab31f29e
- https://github.com/rack/rack/commit/e08f78c656c9394d6737c022bde087e0f33336fd
- https://github.com/rubysec/ruby-advisory-db/blob/master/gems/rack/CVE-2025-61772.yml
- https://github.com/advisories/GHSA-wpv5-97wm-hp9c
Summary
Rack::Multipart::Parser can accumulate unbounded data when a multipart part’s header block never terminates with the required blank line (CRLFCRLF). The parser keeps appending incoming bytes to memory without a size cap, allowing a remote attacker to exhaust memory and cause a denial of service (DoS).
Details
While reading multipart headers, the parser waits for CRLFCRLF using:
@sbuf.scan_until(/(.*?\r\n)\r\n/m)
If the terminator never appears, it continues appending data (@sbuf.concat(content)) indefinitely. There is no limit on accumulated header bytes, so a single malformed part can consume memory proportional to the request body size.
Impact
Attackers can send incomplete multipart headers to trigger high memory use, leading to process termination (OOM) or severe slowdown. The effect scales with request size limits and concurrency. All applications handling multipart uploads may be affected.
Mitigation
- Upgrade to a patched Rack version that caps per-part header size (e.g., 64 KiB).
- Until then, restrict maximum request sizes at the proxy or web server layer (e.g., Nginx
client_max_body_size).
Possible shell escape sequence injection vulnerability in Rack
- https://github.com/rubysec/ruby-advisory-db/blob/master/gems/rack/CVE-2022-30123.yml
- https://groups.google.com/g/ruby-security-ann/c/LWB10kWzag8
- https://github.com/advisories/GHSA-wq4h-7r42-5hrr
- https://github.com/rack/rack/commit/b426cc224908ec6ed6eb8729325392b048215d88
- https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2022-30123
- https://discuss.rubyonrails.org/t/cve-2022-30123-possible-shell-escape-sequence-injection-vulnerability-in-rack/80728
- https://www.debian.org/security/2023/dsa-5530
- https://security.gentoo.org/glsa/202310-18
- https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20231208-0011/
There is a possible shell escape sequence injection vulnerability in the Lint and CommonLogger components of Rack. This vulnerability has been assigned the CVE identifier CVE-2022-30123.
Versions Affected: All. Not affected: None Fixed Versions: 2.0.9.1, 2.1.4.1, 2.2.3.1
Impact
Carefully crafted requests can cause shell escape sequences to be written to the terminal via Rack's Lint middleware and CommonLogger middleware. These escape sequences can be leveraged to possibly execute commands in the victim's terminal.
Impacted applications will have either of these middleware installed, and vulnerable apps may have something like this:
use Rack::Lint
Or
use Rack::CommonLogger
All users running an affected release should either upgrade or use one of the workarounds immediately.
Workarounds
Remove these middleware from your application
Rack has possible DoS Vulnerability with Range Header
- https://github.com/rack/rack/security/advisories/GHSA-xj5v-6v4g-jfw6
- https://github.com/rack/rack/commit/4849132bef471adb21131980df745f4bb84de2d9
- https://github.com/rack/rack/commit/62457686b26d33a15a254c7768c2076e8e02b48b
- https://discuss.rubyonrails.org/t/possible-dos-vulnerability-with-range-header-in-rack/84944
- https://github.com/rubysec/ruby-advisory-db/blob/master/gems/rack/CVE-2024-26141.yml
- https://github.com/advisories/GHSA-xj5v-6v4g-jfw6
- https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-26141
Possible DoS Vulnerability with Range Header in Rack
There is a possible DoS vulnerability relating to the Range request header in Rack. This vulnerability has been assigned the CVE identifier CVE-2024-26141.
Versions Affected: >= 1.3.0. Not affected: < 1.3.0 Fixed Versions: 3.0.9.1, 2.2.8.1
Impact
Carefully crafted Range headers can cause a server to respond with an unexpectedly large response. Responding with such large responses could lead to a denial of service issue.
Vulnerable applications will use the Rack::File middleware or the Rack::Utils.byte_ranges methods (this includes Rails applications).
Releases
The fixed releases are available at the normal locations.
Workarounds
There are no feasible workarounds for this issue.
Patches
To aid users who aren't able to upgrade immediately we have provided patches for the two supported release series. They are in git-am format and consist of a single changeset.
- 3-0-range.patch - Patch for 3.0 series
- 2-2-range.patch - Patch for 2.2 series
Credits
Thank you ooooooo_q for the report and patch
Potential Denial of Service Vulnerability in Rack
Carefully crafted requests can cause a SystemStackError and potentially cause a denial of service attack.
All users running an affected release should upgrade.
Directory traversal in Rack::Directory app bundled with Rack
There was a possible directory traversal vulnerability in the Rack::Directory app that is bundled with Rack.
Versions Affected: rack < 2.2.0 Not affected: Applications that do not use Rack::Directory. Fixed Versions: 2.1.3, >= 2.2.0
Impact
If certain directories exist in a director that is managed by Rack::Directory, an attacker could, using this vulnerability, read the contents of files on the server that were outside of the root specified in the Rack::Directory initializer.
Workarounds
Until such time as the patch is applied or their Rack version is upgraded, we recommend that developers do not use Rack::Directory in their applications.
Percent-encoded cookies can be used to overwrite existing prefixed cookie names
It is possible to forge a secure or host-only cookie prefix in Rack using an arbitrary cookie write by using URL encoding (percent-encoding) on the name of the cookie. This could result in an application that is dependent on this prefix to determine if a cookie is safe to process being manipulated into processing an insecure or cross-origin request. This vulnerability has been assigned the CVE identifier CVE-2020-8184.
Versions Affected: rack < 2.2.3, rack < 2.1.4 Not affected: Applications which do not rely on _Host- and _Secure- prefixes to determine if a cookie is safe to process Fixed Versions: rack >= 2.2.3, rack >= 2.1.4
Impact
An attacker may be able to trick a vulnerable application into processing an insecure (non-SSL) or cross-origin request if they can gain the ability to write arbitrary cookies that are sent to the application.
Workarounds
If your application is impacted but you cannot upgrade to the released versions or apply the provided patch, this issue can be temporarily addressed by adding the following workaround:
module Rack
module Utils
module_function def parse_cookies_header(header)
return {} unless header
header.split(/[;] */n).each_with_object({}) do |cookie, cookies|
next if cookie.empty?
key, value = cookie.split('=', 2)
cookies[key] = (unescape(value) rescue value) unless cookies.key?(key)
end
end
end
end
Denial of Service Vulnerability in Rack Multipart Parsing
There is a possible denial of service vulnerability in the multipart parsing component of Rack. This vulnerability has been assigned the CVE identifier CVE-2022-30122.
Versions Affected: >= 1.2 Not affected: < 1.2 Fixed Versions: 2.0.9.1, 2.1.4.1, 2.2.3.1
Impact
Carefully crafted multipart POST requests can cause Rack's multipart parser to take much longer than expected, leading to a possible denial of service vulnerability.
Impacted code will use Rack's multipart parser to parse multipart posts. This includes directly using the multipart parser like this:
params = Rack::Multipart.parse_multipart(env)
But it also includes reading POST data from a Rack request object like this:
p request.POST # read POST data
p request.params # reads both query params and POST data
All users running an affected release should either upgrade or use one of the workarounds immediately.
Workarounds
There are no feasible workarounds for this issue.
Possible shell escape sequence injection vulnerability in Rack
There is a possible shell escape sequence injection vulnerability in the Lint and CommonLogger components of Rack. This vulnerability has been assigned the CVE identifier CVE-2022-30123.
Versions Affected: All. Not affected: None Fixed Versions: 2.0.9.1, 2.1.4.1, 2.2.3.1
Impact
Carefully crafted requests can cause shell escape sequences to be written to the terminal via Rack's Lint middleware and CommonLogger middleware. These escape sequences can be leveraged to possibly execute commands in the victim's terminal.
Impacted applications will have either of these middleware installed, and vulnerable apps may have something like this:
use Rack::Lint
Or
use Rack::CommonLogger
All users running an affected release should either upgrade or use one of the workarounds immediately.
Workarounds
Remove these middleware from your application
Denial of service via header parsing in Rack
There is a possible denial of service vulnerability in the Range header parsing component of Rack. This vulnerability has been assigned the CVE identifier CVE-2022-44570.
Versions Affected: >= 1.5.0 Not affected: None. Fixed Versions: 2.0.9.2, 2.1.4.2, 2.2.6.2, 3.0.4.1
Impact
Carefully crafted input can cause the Range header parsing component in Rack to take an unexpected amount of time, possibly resulting in a denial of service attack vector. Any applications that deal with Range requests (such as streaming applications, or applications that serve files) may be impacted.
Workarounds
There are no feasible workarounds for this issue.
Denial of Service Vulnerability in Rack Content-Disposition parsing
There is a denial of service vulnerability in the Content-Disposition parsing component of Rack. This vulnerability has been assigned the CVE identifier CVE-2022-44571.
Versions Affected: >= 2.0.0 Not affected: None. Fixed Versions: 2.0.9.2, 2.1.4.2, 2.2.6.1, 3.0.4.1
Impact
Carefully crafted input can cause Content-Disposition header parsing in Rack to take an unexpected amount of time, possibly resulting in a denial of service attack vector. This header is used typically used in multipart parsing. Any applications that parse multipart posts using Rack (virtually all Rails applications) are impacted.
Workarounds
There are no feasible workarounds for this issue.
Denial of service via multipart parsing in Rack
There is a denial of service vulnerability in the multipart parsing component of Rack. This vulnerability has been assigned the CVE identifier CVE-2022-44572.
Versions Affected: >= 2.0.0 Not affected: None. Fixed Versions: 2.0.9.2, 2.1.4.2, 2.2.6.1, 3.0.4.1
Impact
Carefully crafted input can cause RFC2183 multipart boundary parsing in Rack to take an unexpected amount of time, possibly resulting in a denial of service attack vector. Any applications that parse multipart posts using Rack (virtually all Rails applications) are impacted.
Workarounds
There are no feasible workarounds for this issue.
Possible DoS Vulnerability in Multipart MIME parsing
There is a possible DoS vulnerability in the Multipart MIME parsing code in Rack. This vulnerability has been assigned the CVE identifier CVE-2023-27530.
Versions Affected: All. Not affected: None Fixed Versions: 3.0.4.2, 2.2.6.3, 2.1.4.3, 2.0.9.3
Impact
The Multipart MIME parsing code in Rack limits the number of file parts, but does not limit the total number of parts that can be uploaded. Carefully crafted requests can abuse this and cause multipart parsing to take longer than expected.
All users running an affected release should either upgrade or use one of the workarounds immediately.
Workarounds
A proxy can be configured to limit the POST body size which will mitigate this issue.
Possible Denial of Service Vulnerability in Rack’s header parsing
There is a denial of service vulnerability in the header parsing component of Rack. This vulnerability has been assigned the CVE identifier CVE-2023-27539.
Versions Affected: >= 2.0.0 Not affected: None. Fixed Versions: 2.2.6.4, 3.0.6.1
Impact
Carefully crafted input can cause header parsing in Rack to take an unexpected amount of time, possibly resulting in a denial of service attack vector. Any applications that parse headers using Rack (virtually all Rails applications) are impacted.
Workarounds
Setting Regexp.timeout in Ruby 3.2 is a possible workaround.
Denial of Service Vulnerability in Rack Content-Type Parsing
There is a possible denial of service vulnerability in the content type parsing component of Rack. This vulnerability has been assigned the CVE identifier CVE-2024-25126.
Versions Affected: >= 0.4 Not affected: < 0.4 Fixed Versions: 3.0.9.1, 2.2.8.1
Impact
Carefully crafted content type headers can cause Rack’s media type parser to take much longer than expected, leading to a possible denial of service vulnerability.
Impacted code will use Rack’s media type parser to parse content type headers. This code will look like below:
request.media_type
## OR
request.media_type_params
## OR
Rack::MediaType.type(content_type)
Some frameworks (including Rails) call this code internally, so upgrading is recommended!
All users running an affected release should either upgrade or use one of the workarounds immediately.
Releases
The fixed releases are available at the normal locations.
Workarounds
There are no feasible workarounds for this issue.
Possible DoS Vulnerability with Range Header in Rack
There is a possible DoS vulnerability relating to the Range request header in Rack. This vulnerability has been assigned the CVE identifier CVE-2024-26141.
Versions Affected: >= 1.3.0. Not affected: < 1.3.0 Fixed Versions: 3.0.9.1, 2.2.8.1
Impact
Carefully crafted Range headers can cause a server to respond with an unexpectedly large response. Responding with such large responses could lead to a denial of service issue.
Vulnerable applications will use the Rack::File middleware or the Rack::Utils.byte_ranges methods (this includes Rails applications).
Releases
The fixed releases are available at the normal locations.
Workarounds
There are no feasible workarounds for this issue.
Possible Denial of Service Vulnerability in Rack Header Parsing
There is a possible denial of service vulnerability in the header parsing routines in Rack. This vulnerability has been assigned the CVE identifier CVE-2024-26146.
Versions Affected: All. Not affected: None Fixed Versions: 2.0.9.4, 2.1.4.4, 2.2.8.1, 3.0.9.1
Impact
Carefully crafted headers can cause header parsing in Rack to take longer than expected resulting in a possible denial of service issue. Accept and Forwarded headers are impacted.
Ruby 3.2 has mitigations for this problem, so Rack applications using Ruby 3.2 or newer are unaffected.
Releases
The fixed releases are available at the normal locations.
Workarounds
There are no feasible workarounds for this issue.
Possible Log Injection in Rack::CommonLogger
Summary
Rack::CommonLogger can be exploited by crafting input that includes newline characters to manipulate log entries. The supplied proof-of-concept demonstrates injecting malicious content into logs.
Details
When a user provides the authorization credentials via Rack::Auth::Basic, if success, the username will be put in env['REMOTE_USER'] and later be used by Rack::CommonLogger for logging purposes.
The issue occurs when a server intentionally or unintentionally allows a user creation with the username contain CRLF and white space characters, or the server just want to log every login attempts. If an attacker enters a username with CRLF character, the logger will log the malicious username with CRLF characters into the logfile.
Impact
Attackers can break log formats or insert fraudulent entries, potentially obscuring real activity or injecting malicious data into log files.
Mitigation
- Update to the latest version of Rack.
Escape Sequence Injection vulnerability in Rack lead to Possible Log Injection
Summary
Rack::Sendfile can be exploited by crafting input that includes newline characters to manipulate log entries.
Details
The Rack::Sendfile middleware logs unsanitized header values from the X-Sendfile-Type header. An attacker can exploit this by injecting escape sequences (such as newline characters) into the header, resulting in log injection.
Impact
This vulnerability can distort log files, obscure attack traces, and complicate security auditing.
Mitigation
- Update to the latest version of Rack, or
- Remove usage of
Rack::Sendfile.
Local File Inclusion in Rack::Static
Summary
Rack::Static can serve files under the specified root: even if urls: are provided, which may expose other files under the specified root: unexpectedly.
Details
The vulnerability occurs because Rack::Static does not properly sanitize user-supplied paths before serving files. Specifically, encoded path traversal sequences are not correctly validated, allowing attackers to access files outside the designated static file directory.
Impact
By exploiting this vulnerability, an attacker can gain access to all files under the specified root: directory, provided they are able to determine then path of the file.
Mitigation
- Update to the latest version of Rack, or
- Remove usage of
Rack::Static, or - Ensure that
root:points at a directory path which only contains files which should be accessed publicly.
It is likely that a CDN or similar static file server would also mitigate the issue.
Rack session gets restored after deletion
Summary
When using the Rack::Session::Pool middleware, simultaneous rack requests can restore a deleted rack session, which allows the unauthenticated user to occupy that session.
Details
Rack session middleware prepares the session at the beginning of request, then saves is back to the store with possible changes applied by host rack application. This way the session becomes to be a subject of race conditions in general sense over concurrent rack requests.
Impact
When using the Rack::Session::Pool middleware, and provided the attacker can acquire a session cookie (already a major issue), the session may be restored if the attacker can trigger a long running request (within that same session) adjacent to the user logging out, in order to retain illicit access even after a user has attempted to logout.
Mitigation
- Update to the latest version of
rack, or - Ensure your application invalidates sessions atomically by marking them as logged out e.g., using a
logged_outflag, instead of deleting them, and check this flag on every request to prevent reuse, or - Implement a custom session store that tracks session invalidation timestamps and refuses to accept session data if the session was invalidated after the request began.
Related
As this code was moved to rack-session in Rack 3+, see https://github.com/rack/rack-session/security/advisories/GHSA-9j94-67jr-4cqj for the equivalent advisory in rack-session (affecting Rack 3+ only).
Rack has an Unbounded-Parameter DoS in Rack::QueryParser
Summary
Rack::QueryParser parses query strings and application/x-www-form-urlencoded bodies into Ruby data structures without imposing any limit on the number of parameters, allowing attackers to send requests with extremely large numbers of parameters.
Details
The vulnerability arises because Rack::QueryParser iterates over each &-separated key-value pair and adds it to a Hash without enforcing an upper bound on the total number of parameters. This allows an attacker to send a single request containing hundreds of thousands (or more) of parameters, which consumes excessive memory and CPU during parsing.
Impact
An attacker can trigger denial of service by sending specifically crafted HTTP requests, which can cause memory exhaustion or pin CPU resources, stalling or crashing the Rack server. This results in full service disruption until the affected worker is restarted.
Mitigation
- Update to a version of Rack that limits the number of parameters parsed, or
- Use middleware to enforce a maximum query string size or parameter count, or
- Employ a reverse proxy (such as Nginx) to limit request sizes and reject oversized query strings or bodies.
Limiting request body sizes and query string lengths at the web server or CDN level is an effective mitigation.
Rack has an unsafe default in Rack::QueryParser allows params_limit bypass via semicolon-separated parameters
Summary
Rack::QueryParser in version < 2.2.18 enforces its params_limit only for parameters separated by &, while still splitting on both & and ;. As a result, attackers could use ; separators to bypass the parameter count limit and submit more parameters than intended.
Details
The issue arises because Rack::QueryParser#check_query_string counts only & characters when determining the number of parameters, but the default separator regex DEFAULT_SEP = /[&;] */n splits on both & and ;. This mismatch means that queries using ; separators were not included in the parameter count, allowing params_limit to be bypassed.
Other safeguards (bytesize_limit and key_space_limit) still applied, but did not prevent this particular bypass.
Impact
Applications or middleware that directly invoke Rack::QueryParser with its default configuration (no explicit delimiter) could be exposed to increased CPU and memory consumption. This can be abused as a limited denial-of-service vector.
Rack::Request, the primary entry point for typical Rack applications, uses QueryParser in a safe way and does not appear vulnerable by default. As such, the severity is considered low, with the impact limited to edge cases where QueryParser is used directly.
Mitigation
- Upgrade to a patched version of Rack where both
∧are counted consistently towardparams_limit. - If upgrading is not immediately possible, configure
QueryParserwith an explicit delimiter (e.g.,&) to avoid the mismatch. - As a general precaution, enforce query string and request size limits at the web server or proxy layer (e.g., Nginx, Apache, or a CDN) to mitigate excessive parsing overhead.
Rack's unbounded multipart preamble buffering enables DoS (memory exhaustion)
Summary
Rack::Multipart::Parser buffers the entire multipart preamble (bytes before the first boundary) in memory without any size limit. A client can send a large preamble followed by a valid boundary, causing significant memory use and potential process termination due to out-of-memory (OOM) conditions.
Details
While searching for the first boundary, the parser appends incoming data into a shared buffer (@sbuf.concat(content)) and scans for the boundary pattern:
@sbuf.scan_until(@body_regex)
If the boundary is not yet found, the parser continues buffering data indefinitely. There is no trimming or size cap on the preamble, allowing attackers to send arbitrary amounts of data before the first boundary.
Impact
Remote attackers can trigger large transient memory spikes by including a long preamble in multipart/form-data requests. The impact scales with allowed request sizes and concurrency, potentially causing worker crashes or severe slowdown due to garbage collection.
Mitigation
Upgrade: Use a patched version of Rack that enforces a preamble size limit (e.g., 16 KiB) or discards preamble data entirely per RFC 2046 § 5.1.1.
Workarounds:
- Limit total request body size at the proxy or web server level.
- Monitor memory and set per-process limits to prevent OOM conditions.
Multipart parser buffers large non‑file fields entirely in memory, enabling DoS (memory exhaustion)
Summary
Rack::Multipart::Parser stores non-file form fields (parts without a filename) entirely in memory as Ruby String objects. A single large text field in a multipart/form-data request (hundreds of megabytes or more) can consume equivalent process memory, potentially leading to out-of-memory (OOM) conditions and denial of service (DoS).
Details
During multipart parsing, file parts are streamed to temporary files, but non-file parts are buffered into memory:
body = String.new # non-file → in-RAM buffer
@mime_parts[mime_index].body << content
There is no size limit on these in-memory buffers. As a result, any large text field—while technically valid—will be loaded fully into process memory before being added to params.
Impact
Attackers can send large non-file fields to trigger excessive memory usage. Impact scales with request size and concurrency, potentially leading to worker crashes or severe garbage-collection overhead. All Rack applications processing multipart form submissions are affected.
Mitigation
Upgrade: Use a patched version of Rack that enforces a reasonable size cap for non-file fields (e.g., 2 MiB).
Workarounds:
- Restrict maximum request body size at the web-server or proxy layer (e.g., Nginx
client_max_body_size). - Validate and reject unusually large form fields at the application level.
- Restrict maximum request body size at the web-server or proxy layer (e.g., Nginx
Rack's multipart parser buffers unbounded per-part headers, enabling DoS (memory exhaustion)
Summary
Rack::Multipart::Parser can accumulate unbounded data when a multipart part’s header block never terminates with the required blank line (CRLFCRLF). The parser keeps appending incoming bytes to memory without a size cap, allowing a remote attacker to exhaust memory and cause a denial of service (DoS).
Details
While reading multipart headers, the parser waits for CRLFCRLF using:
@sbuf.scan_until(/(.*?\r
)\r
/m)
If the terminator never appears, it continues appending data (@sbuf.concat(content)) indefinitely. There is no limit on accumulated header bytes, so a single malformed part can consume memory proportional to the request body size.
Impact
Attackers can send incomplete multipart headers to trigger high memory use, leading to process termination (OOM) or severe slowdown. The effect scales with request size limits and concurrency. All applications handling multipart uploads may be affected.
Mitigation
Upgrade to a patched Rack version that caps per-part header size (e.g., 64 KiB).
Until then, restrict maximum request sizes at the proxy or web server layer (e.g., Nginx
client_max_body_size).
Rack has a Possible Information Disclosure Vulnerability
Summary
A possible information disclosure vulnerability existed in Rack::Sendfile when running behind a proxy that supports x-sendfile headers (such as Nginx). Specially crafted headers could cause Rack::Sendfile to miscommunicate with the proxy and trigger unintended internal requests, potentially bypassing proxy-level access restrictions.
Details
When Rack::Sendfile received untrusted x-sendfile-type or x-accel-mapping headers from a client, it would interpret them as proxy configuration directives. This could cause the middleware to send a redirect
response to the proxy, prompting it to reissue a new internal request that was not subject to the proxy's access controls.
An attacker could exploit this by: 1. Setting a crafted x-sendfile-type: x-accel-redirect header. 2. Setting a crafted x-accel-mapping header. 3. Requesting a path that qualifies for proxy-based acceleration.
Impact
Attackers could bypass proxy-enforced restrictions and access internal endpoints intended to be protected (such as administrative pages). The vulnerability did not allow arbitrary file reads but could expose sensitive application routes.
This issue only affected systems meeting all of the following conditions:
- The application used
Rack::Sendfilewith a proxy that supportsx-accel-redirect(e.g., Nginx). - The proxy did not always set or remove the
x-sendfile-typeandx-accel-mappingheaders. - The application exposed an endpoint that returned a body responding to
.to_path.
Mitigation
- Upgrade to a fixed version of Rack which requires explicit configuration to enable
x-accel-redirect:
use Rack::Sendfile, "x-accel-redirect"
- Alternatively, configure the proxy to always set or strip the headers (you should be doing this!):
proxy_set_header x-sendfile-type x-accel-redirect;
proxy_set_header x-accel-mapping /var/www/=/files/;
- Or in Rails applications, disable sendfile completely:
config.action_dispatch.x_sendfile_header = nil
Rack is vulnerable to a memory-exhaustion DoS through unbounded URL-encoded body parsing
Summary
Rack::Request#POST reads the entire request body into memory for Content-Type: application/x-www-form-urlencoded, calling rack.input.read(nil) without enforcing a length or cap. Large request bodies can therefore be buffered completely into process memory before parsing, leading to denial of service (DoS) through memory exhaustion.
Details
When handling non-multipart form submissions, Rack’s request parser performs:
form_vars = get_header(RACK_INPUT).read
Since read is called with no argument, the entire request body is loaded into a Ruby String. This occurs before query parameter parsing or enforcement of any params_limit. As a result, Rack applications without an upstream body-size limit can experience unbounded memory allocation proportional to request size.
Impact
Attackers can send large application/x-www-form-urlencoded bodies to consume process memory, causing slowdowns or termination by the operating system (OOM). The effect scales linearly with request size and concurrency. Even with parsing limits configured, the issue occurs before those limits are enforced.
Mitigation
- Update to a patched version of Rack that enforces form parameter limits using
query_parser.bytesize_limit, preventing unbounded reads ofapplication/x-www-form-urlencodedbodies. - Enforce strict maximum body size at the proxy or web server layer (e.g., Nginx
client_max_body_size, ApacheLimitRequestBody).
172 Other Versions
| Version | License | Security | Released | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2.2.21 | MIT | 2025-11-02 - 12:19 | 27 days | |
| 2.2.20 | MIT | 2025-10-10 - 00:36 | about 2 months | |
| 2.2.19 | MIT | 2 | 2025-10-07 - 01:51 | about 2 months |
| 2.2.18 | MIT | 5 | 2025-09-25 - 09:02 | 2 months |
| 2.2.17 | MIT | 7 | 2025-06-03 - 01:57 | 6 months |
| 2.2.16 | MIT | 7 | 2025-05-22 - 05:33 | 6 months |
| 2.2.15 | MIT | 7 | 2025-05-18 - 02:38 | 7 months |
| 2.2.14 | MIT | 7 | 2025-05-06 - 21:33 | 7 months |
| 2.2.13 | MIT | 10 | 2025-03-10 - 21:19 | 9 months |
| 2.2.12 | MIT | 11 | 2025-03-04 - 05:45 | 9 months |
| 2.2.11 | MIT | 12 | 2025-02-12 - 03:54 | 10 months |
| 2.2.10 | MIT | 13 | 2024-10-14 - 01:47 | about 1 year |
| 2.2.9 | MIT | 13 | 2024-03-21 - 01:19 | over 1 year |
| 2.2.8.1 | MIT | 13 | 2024-02-21 - 19:23 | almost 2 years |
| 2.2.8 | MIT | 19 | 2023-07-31 - 02:43 | over 2 years |
| 2.2.7 | MIT | 19 | 2023-04-24 - 23:22 | over 2 years |
| 2.2.6.4 | MIT | 19 | 2023-03-13 - 18:10 | over 2 years |
| 2.2.6.3 | MIT | 21 | 2023-03-02 - 22:57 | over 2 years |
| 2.2.6.2 | MIT | 23 | 2023-01-17 - 21:22 | almost 3 years |
| 2.2.6.1 | MIT | 25 | 2023-01-17 - 20:48 | almost 3 years |
| 2.2.6 | MIT | 29 | 2023-01-16 - 21:05 | almost 3 years |
| 2.2.5 | MIT | 29 | 2022-12-26 - 20:19 | almost 3 years |
| 2.2.4 | MIT | 29 | 2022-06-30 - 22:22 | over 3 years |
| 2.2.3.1 | MIT | 29 | 2022-05-27 - 15:31 | over 3 years |
| 2.2.3 | MIT | 33 | 2020-06-15 - 22:25 | over 5 years |
| 2.2.2 | MIT | 35 | 2020-02-10 - 22:25 | almost 6 years |
| 2.2.1 | MIT | 35 | 2020-02-09 - 06:20 | almost 6 years |
| 2.2.0 | MIT | 35 | 2020-02-08 - 18:26 | almost 6 years |
| 2.1.4.4 | MIT | 28 | 2024-02-21 - 19:21 | almost 2 years |
| 2.1.4.3 | MIT | 30 | 2023-03-02 - 22:57 | over 2 years |
| 2.1.4.2 | MIT | 32 | 2023-01-17 - 20:48 | almost 3 years |
| 2.1.4.1 | MIT | 38 | 2022-05-27 - 15:31 | over 3 years |
| 2.1.4 | MIT | 42 | 2020-06-15 - 22:24 | over 5 years |
| 2.1.3 | MIT | 43 | 2020-05-12 - 21:44 | over 5 years |
| 2.1.2 | MIT | 44 | 2020-01-27 - 22:42 | almost 6 years |
| 2.1.1 | MIT | 44 | 2020-01-11 - 22:18 | almost 6 years |
| 2.1.0 | MIT | 44 | 2020-01-10 - 17:49 | almost 6 years |
| 2.0.9.4 | MIT | 32 | 2024-02-21 - 19:20 | almost 2 years |
| 2.0.9.3 | MIT | 34 | 2023-03-02 - 22:57 | over 2 years |
| 2.0.9.2 | MIT | 36 | 2023-01-17 - 20:48 | almost 3 years |
| 2.0.9.1 | MIT | 42 | 2022-05-27 - 15:31 | over 3 years |
| 2.0.9 | MIT | 46 | 2020-02-08 - 18:21 | almost 6 years |
| 2.0.8 | MIT | 46 | 2019-12-18 - 18:08 | almost 6 years |
| 2.0.7 | MIT | 48 | 2019-04-02 - 16:54 | over 6 years |
| 2.0.6 | MIT | 48 | 2018-11-05 - 20:00 | about 7 years |
| 2.0.5 | MIT | 52 | 2018-04-23 - 17:47 | over 7 years |
| 2.0.4 | MIT | 52 | 2018-01-31 - 18:17 | almost 8 years |
| 2.0.3 | MIT | 50 | 2017-05-15 - 16:50 | over 8 years |
| 2.0.2 | MIT | 50 | 2017-05-08 - 17:08 | over 8 years |
| 2.0.1 | MIT | 50 | 2016-06-30 - 17:34 | over 9 years |
