NodeJS/brace-expansion/3.0.3
Brace expansion as known from sh/bash
https://www.npmjs.com/package/brace-expansion
MIT
2 Security Vulnerabilities
brace-expansion: DoS via exponential-time expansion of consecutive non-expanding {} groups
- https://github.com/juliangruber/brace-expansion/security/advisories/GHSA-3jxr-9vmj-r5cp
- https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-13149
- https://github.com/juliangruber/brace-expansion/pull/122
- https://github.com/juliangruber/brace-expansion/pull/123
- https://github.com/juliangruber/brace-expansion/commit/835d6be91201122d9adffb0c0c8c094189ace265
- https://github.com/juliangruber/brace-expansion/commit/c7e33ec13ac1a684c116720843ce24e208611754
- https://github.com/juliangruber/brace-expansion/commit/d74e63030c012e3b7ae81657b8d665619cd51b95
- https://github.com/juliangruber/brace-expansion/releases/tag/v1.1.16
- https://github.com/juliangruber/brace-expansion/releases/tag/v2.1.2
- https://github.com/juliangruber/brace-expansion/releases/tag/v5.0.7
- https://www.npmjs.com/package/brace-expansion
- https://github.com/advisories/GHSA-3jxr-9vmj-r5cp
Summary
brace-expansion's expand() exhibits exponential-time - O(2ⁿ) - behavior in the number of consecutive non-expanding {} groups. A short, all-ASCII input (~90 bytes/30 groups) blocks the calling thread for minutes; a slightly longer input hangs it effectively indefinitely. Because the dominant consumers run on Node's single-threaded event loop, one small input can fully stall a worker/process.
In expand_, post is computed unconditionally at the top of the function, before the early-return branches that don't use it: js const post = m.post.length ? expand_(m.post, max, false) : ['']; // always recurses ... if (!isSequence && !isOptions) { if (m.post.match(/,(?!,).*\}/)) { str = m.pre + '{' + m.body + escClose + m.post; return expand_(str, max, true); // restart — `post` discarded } return [str]; }
For input like a{},{},…, the first {} is non-expanding, so control reaches the {a},b} rewrite branch - but expand_ has already recursed into post over the entire remaining tail, only to throw the result away. Each level therefore spawns two recursive expansions over essentially the same remaining work: T(n) = 2·T(n−1) ⇒ O(2ⁿ).
The max option does not mitigate this: max only bounds the output-building loops; neither the post recursion nor the rewrite recursion consults it.
Measured on 5.0.6:
| groups (n) | input bytes | time |
|---|---|---|
| 20 | 60 | 130 ms |
| 24 | 72 | 1.9 s |
| 26 | 78 | 7.8 s |
| 30 (PoC) | 90 | ~2 min |
Proof of concept
const { expand } = require('brace-expansion');
// 30 non-expanding groups, ~90 bytes — blocks for minutes:
expand('a{},{},{},{},{},{},{},{},{},{},{},{},{},{},{},{},{},{},{},{},{},{},{},{},{},{},{},{},{},{}');
Impact
Any application that passes attacker-influenced strings to brace-expansion.expand() - directly or transitively via minimatch/glob brace patterns - can be driven into a multi-minute-to-indefinite CPU hang by a tiny request, denying service on that thread/process.
Remediation
Upgrade to a patched release. The fix: 1. Defers computing post until after the early-return branches (and computes it locally in the $-suffix branch), so post is only expanded when a brace set actually expands and the value is used. This alone removes the exponential. 1. Converts the {a},b} rewrite from recursion to an in-function loop, so a long run of rewrites cannot grow the call stack.
Verified: the PoC drops from ~2 min to 0.55 ms, 5,000 groups complete in ~344 ms, and output is identical to 5.0.6 across a behavioral-equivalence suite (sequences, padding, $-prefix, a{},b}c, {},a}b, x{{a,b}}y, etc.). Post-fix complexity is ~O(n²) on this input class - acceptable for the security fix; a linear rewrite can be a non-urgent follow-up.
If immediate upgrade isn't possible, avoid passing untrusted input to expand() / glob brace patterns, or run such expansion under a timeout/worker.
brace-expansion: DoS via unbounded intermediate arrays, bypassing the CVE-2026-14257 mitigation
- https://github.com/juliangruber/brace-expansion/security/advisories/GHSA-rgw5-rvv9-x895
- https://github.com/juliangruber/brace-expansion/commit/139d015104e71433ad52a41d19467c48ecbb2c7d
- https://github.com/juliangruber/brace-expansion/commit/1e30c930238d7162802d88a94189182def178dac
- https://github.com/juliangruber/brace-expansion/commit/688a99eeaab02627c2b89ba8ba4821fecfa659cf
- https://github.com/juliangruber/brace-expansion/commit/cb4b9e47cc2ec777c14b2b4492fb431a56f6a031
- https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-69152
- https://github.com/advisories/GHSA-rgw5-rvv9-x895
Summary
The maxLength mitigation added in 5.0.8 for GHSA-mh99-v99m-4gvg / CVE-2026-14257 is incomplete. It bounds the accumulator where results are combined, but not the intermediate arrays that feed it. A ~25 KB input still crashes the Node process with an uncatchable out-of-memory error, so try/catch around expand() does not help.
A second, related path in the same function lets a ~400 KB input block the event loop for over two minutes without ever exceeding the memory bound.
Details
maxLength was enforced in combine(), the single place output grows. Two arrays are built before combine() runs, and neither was bounded.
1. Comma alternatives accumulate without a running total (memory exhaustion)
Each alternative in {a,b,c,...} is expanded by its own recursive expand_() call, so each receives a full, independent maxLength allowance. The results were then concatenated into a single values array with no cumulative limit:
values = []
for (let j = 0; j < n.length; j++) {
values.push.apply(values, expand_(n[j], max, maxLength, false))
}
acc = combine(acc, pre, values, max, maxLength, ...)
With A alternatives, values can reach A * maxLength characters before combine() gets a chance to truncate it. At the default maxLength of 4,000,000 and 400 alternatives, that is well past any default heap.
2. Padded sequences ignore maxLength while generating (CPU exhaustion)
expandSequence() was bounded by max (the result count) but never consulted maxLength. A padded sequence's element width follows the input, so {0...01..100000} with a wide pad generates max elements, each as wide as the input, only for combine() to discard all but a handful.
Memory stays flat here, because V8 represents the padded strings as cons-strings, which is likely why this path was not caught alongside the original issue. The cost is time: work proportional to max * width.
| pad width | input bytes | results kept | time (5.0.8) | time (patched) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 20,000 | 20 KB | 199 | ~7.3 s | ~20 ms |
| 100,000 | 100 KB | 39 | ~32 s | ~20 ms |
| 400,000 | 400 KB | 9 | ~124 s | ~18 ms |
Output is byte-identical before and after the fix; only the wasted work is removed.
Proof of concept
Memory exhaustion, against 5.0.8:
import { expand } from 'brace-expansion'
const part = '{' + '0'.repeat(50) + '1..100000}'
const input = '{' + Array(400).fill(part).join(',') + '}' // ~25 KB
try {
expand(input)
} catch (e) {
// never reached - the process is already dead
}
FATAL ERROR: Ineffective mark-compacts near heap limit Allocation failed - JavaScript heap out of memory
Aborted
Event-loop stall, against 5.0.8:
import { expand } from 'brace-expansion'
// ~400 KB input, returns 9 results after roughly two minutes of blocking CPU
expand('{' + '0'.repeat(400_000) + '1..100000}')
Impact
Denial of service. Any application that passes attacker-controlled input to expand(), directly or transitively through a glob or pattern-matching library, can be remotely crashed or stalled. The out-of-memory variant terminates the process and cannot be handled with try/catch.
Applications already on 5.0.8 are affected: the 5.0.8 mitigation does not cover these paths.
Patches
Both intermediate arrays are now bounded as they are built, using the same max and maxLength limits already applied in combine():
valuestracks a running result count and character length while alternatives are appended, and stops once either bound is reached.expandSequence()acceptsmaxLengthand stops generating once the sequence's own characters reach it.
As with the existing limits, output is truncated rather than allowed to grow without bound, which matches how max already behaves. The defaults sit well above any realistic expansion, so legitimate input is unaffected.
Workarounds
If upgrading is not immediately possible, avoid passing untrusted input to expand() or to glob brace patterns, or pass an explicitly small max and maxLength.
Note that a small maxLength alone was not sufficient on affected versions: it was applied per alternative rather than cumulatively, which is the root of the first issue above.
Credits
The memory-exhaustion bypass was reported by Alessio Della Libera, CEO & Co-founder at Numyra.
The sequence-generation issue was found while verifying that report.
48 Other Versions
| Version | License | Security | Released | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 5.0.9 | MIT | 2026-07-30 - 10:00 | about 1 month | |
| 5.0.8 | MIT | 1 | 2026-07-23 - 11:39 | about 1 month |
| 5.0.7 | MIT | 2 | 2026-06-29 - 03:47 | 2 months |
| 5.0.6 | MIT | 3 | 2026-05-08 - 05:41 | 4 months |
| 5.0.5 | MIT | 4 | 2026-03-24 - 17:58 | 5 months |
| 5.0.4 | MIT | 5 | 2026-02-27 - 09:37 | 6 months |
| 5.0.3 | MIT | 5 | 2026-02-22 - 11:37 | 6 months |
| 5.0.2 | MIT | 5 | 2026-02-12 - 08:18 | 7 months |
| 4.0.1 | MIT | 4 | 2025-06-11 - 07:04 | about 1 year |
| 4.0.0 | MIT | 5 | 2024-02-27 - 11:56 | over 2 years |
| 3.0.6 | MIT | 1 | 2026-07-30 - 10:13 | about 1 month |
| 3.0.5 | MIT | 2 | 2026-07-28 - 10:44 | about 1 month |
| 3.0.4 | MIT | 2 | 2026-07-27 - 22:27 | about 1 month |
| 3.0.3 | MIT | 2 | 2026-07-27 - 19:35 | about 1 month |
| 3.0.2 | MIT | 3 | 2026-03-27 - 08:41 | 5 months |
| 3.0.1 | MIT | 4 | 2025-06-11 - 08:44 | about 1 year |
| 3.0.0 | MIT | 5 | 2023-10-07 - 13:31 | almost 3 years |
| 2.1.4 | MIT | 2026-07-30 - 10:15 | about 1 month | |
| 2.1.3 | MIT | 1 | 2026-07-28 - 10:16 | about 1 month |
| 2.1.2 | MIT | 2 | 2026-07-08 - 06:53 | about 2 months |
| 2.1.1 | MIT | 3 | 2026-05-25 - 10:13 | 3 months |
| 2.1.0 | MIT | 3 | 2026-04-11 - 13:26 | 5 months |
| 2.0.3 | MIT | 3 | 2026-03-27 - 08:40 | 5 months |
| 2.0.2 | MIT | 4 | 2025-06-11 - 08:48 | about 1 year |
| 2.0.1 | MIT | 5 | 2021-02-22 - 16:18 | over 5 years |
| 2.0.0 | MIT | 5 | 2020-10-05 - 11:41 | almost 6 years |
| 1.1.18 | MIT | 2026-07-30 - 10:17 | about 1 month | |
| 1.1.17 | MIT | 1 | 2026-07-29 - 10:45 | about 1 month |
| 1.1.16 | MIT | 2 | 2026-07-08 - 06:34 | about 2 months |
| 1.1.15 | MIT | 3 | 2026-05-26 - 08:43 | 3 months |
| 1.1.14 | MIT | 3 | 2026-04-11 - 13:25 | 5 months |
| 1.1.13 | MIT | 3 | 2026-03-27 - 08:39 | 5 months |
| 1.1.12 | MIT | 4 | 2025-06-11 - 08:52 | about 1 year |
| 1.1.11 | MIT | 5 | 2018-02-10 - 07:42 | over 8 years |
| 1.1.10 | MIT | 5 | 2018-02-09 - 21:13 | over 8 years |
| 1.1.9 | MIT | 5 | 2018-02-09 - 09:53 | over 8 years |
| 1.1.8 | MIT | 5 | 2017-06-12 - 07:19 | about 9 years |
| 1.1.7 | MIT | 5 | 2017-04-07 - 08:13 | over 9 years |
| 1.1.6 | MIT | 7 | 2016-07-20 - 20:48 | about 10 years |
| 1.1.5 | MIT | 7 | 2016-06-15 - 11:21 | about 10 years |
| 1.1.4 | MIT | 7 | 2016-05-01 - 19:14 | over 10 years |
| 1.1.3 | MIT | 7 | 2016-02-11 - 18:51 | over 10 years |
| 1.1.2 | MIT | 7 | 2015-11-28 - 12:58 | almost 11 years |
| 1.1.1 | MIT | 7 | 2015-09-27 - 21:58 | almost 11 years |
| 1.1.0 | MIT | 7 | 2014-12-16 - 18:58 | over 11 years |
| 1.0.1 | MIT | 7 | 2014-12-03 - 07:58 | over 11 years |
| 1.0.0 | MIT | 7 | 2014-11-30 - 09:58 | almost 12 years |
| 0.0.0 | MIT | 6 | 2013-10-13 - 12:58 | almost 13 years |
